Skip to main content
Skip to side navigation
Skip to site information
Government of Canada navigation bar
Canada.ca
Services
Departments
Français
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Search
Search
Site menu
About SSHRC
aaa
Governance
Executive Team
President's Desk
Reports and Publications
Facts and Figures
Policies, Regulations and Guidelines
Service Standards
Partnerships
Interagency collaboration
Equity, diversity and inclusion in the research enterprise
Careers
aaa
About SSHRC - Main page
Funding
aaa
Research Training and Talent Development
Insight Research
Research Partnerships
Joint initiatives
Future Challenge Areas
Funding search tool
Upcoming Deadlines
Upcoming Webinars
How to Apply
Forms
Impact Awards
Merit Review
Using Your Funds
aaa
Funding - Main page
Competition Results
aaa
Notification of Competition Results
Award Recipients
Competition Statistics
Program Expenditures
Awards Search Engine
aaa
Competition Results - Main page
Connecting with Society
aaa
Indigenous Research
Community Engagement
Imagining Canada’s Future
In Conversation With
Research Stories
SSHRC Leaders
Real Insight. Real Impact. Real Purpose.
The Storytellers
aaa
Connecting with Society - Main page
News Room
aaa
aaa
News Room - Main page
aaa
Home
About SSHRC
Reports and Publications
Evaluation Reports
Evaluation of Aid to Scholarly Journals
Evaluation of Aid to Scholarly Journals
PDF document
About the funding opportunity and the evaluation
Aid to Scholarly Journals’ (ASJ) primary objective is to increase dissemination of Canadian research in the social sciences and humanities (SSH). ASJ seeks to achieve this through funding to Canadian scholarly journals in SSH, recognizing these journals as a primary tool for research dissemination.
ASJ currently provides more than $3 million in funding annually to about 160 journals. Funding is awarded through periodic competitions, This evaluation covered the period of 2008-17 for performance-related questions and 2008-18 for questions related to relevance, cost-efficiency and alternatives.
Program relevance and performance were identified as priority areas for evaluation, including how the design of ASJ contributes to its performance.
This was a joint evaluation of two funding initiatives: ASJ and Awards to Scholarly Publications Program (ASPP). Two reports were produced. This summary presents highlights from the ASJ report.
Questions
Is there a need for the federal government to provide direct financial support to journals and publishers in the scholarly publishing sector to increase dissemination of Canadian SSH research results?
Do ASJ and ASPP objectives align with federal roles and priorities?
What contribution has ASJ/ASPP funding made to the quantity, quality and dissemination of published Canadian SSH research?
Are ASJ/ASPP delivered in a cost-efficient manner?
Are there viable alternative approaches SSHRC should consider to increase dissemination of original Canadian research results in the social sciences and humanities?
Conclusion
Relevance
Canadian journals have served as a publication channel for a majority of Canadian SSH researchers (65%).
Canadian journals were rated as important channels for publication by 84% of researchers surveyed: they report that these journals are not only important for the dissemination of their research, but also as content for input to their research, to connect them with peer researchers and target audiences, and for cultivation of Canadian research.
Without ASJ, most funded journals would lose more than half of their revenue. Alternate revenue sources are limited, especially for Gold open access journals.
Performance
ASJ funding has enabled a significant and meaningful increase in the amount of SSH research published each year.
The findings suggest that ASJ also has made small, indirect contributions in some other areas, such as journal capacity to assure manuscript quality, and practices related to accessibility and discoverability of the research published.
Potential
Canadian journals are positioned to influence EDI at the system level, and some journals already play a role to mobilize research on equity-related topics (e.g., Indigenous research).
ASJ is also an important component of SSHRC’s effort to increase quality open access capacity in Canada. The funding is especially important to Gold open access journals whose alternative revenue sources are limited.
Cost efficiency
The data for ASJ indicate that it is cost-efficient.
Recommendations
Continue to offer ASJ funding.
Canadian journals remain important to the SSH research system in Canada. ASJ funding is increasingly relevant for journals transitioning to open access.
Review ASJ’s objectives to align more closely with the Insight Program and ASJ’s key strengths.
An improved alignment with the Insight Program and the role of Canadian journals as identified by researchers would improve ASJ’s focus and may enable it to do more with its limited resources.
Ensure operational alignment of ASJ to updated objectives.
More fully developed objectives should be carried forward into ASJ’s adjudication and performance monitoring practices.
Update ASJ’s logic model.
ASJ’s current logic model should be updated to better capture ASJ’s performance and the mechanisms by which it contributes to outcomes.
At the corporate level, consider using ASJ as a vehicle to further advance key council priorities.
ASJ has the potential to be a point of leverage for SSHRC in the SSH research system to advance objectives related to the assessment of research excellence, research use, equity, diversity and inclusion, open research and other areas.
Date modified:
2021-06-30
Secondary menu
About SSHRC
Governance
Executive Team
President's Desk
Reports and Publications
Audit Reports
Consultation Reports
Corporate Reports
eNewsletter
Evaluation Reports
Strategic Plans
Facts and Figures
Policies, Regulations and Guidelines
Service Standards
Partnerships
Interagency collaboration
Equity, diversity and inclusion in the research enterprise
Careers